Nuclear Med Tech Salary

San Francisco vs Bakersfield: Nuclear Medicine Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare nuclear medicine technologist salaries between San Francisco, CA and Bakersfield, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

San Francisco, CA
$199,204
$95.78/hr
Bakersfield, CA
$188,765
$90.75/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSan Francisco, CABakersfield, CA
Median Salary$199,204$188,765
Hourly Rate$95.78$90.75
Entry Level (P10)$143,155$136,896
25th Percentile$179,901$155,569
75th Percentile$206,887$220,425
Top Earner (P90)$215,095$256,305
Total Employed170101
Side-by-side bar chart comparing San Francisco ($199,204) and Bakersfield ($188,765) nuclear medicine technologist salaries.San FranciscoBakersfieldMedian Salary$199,204$188,765Entry Level (P10)$143,155$136,896Top Earner (P90)$215,095$256,305US Median $106,398

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for nuclear medicine technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Bakersfield.

The salary gap between San Francisco and Bakersfield is $10,439 (5.53%). San Francisco's median is +87.23% compared to the US national median of $106,398.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in San Francisco spans $71,940,Bakersfield spans $119,409. Bakersfield has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced nuclear medicine technologists.

San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$143,155
P25$179,901
Median$199,204
P75$206,887
P90 (Top)$215,095
Bakersfield
P10 (Entry)$136,896
P25$155,569
Median$188,765
P75$220,425
P90 (Top)$256,305

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($172,302 effective) pays 3.24% more than Bakersfield ($166,901 effective).

San Francisco
Nominal: $199,204
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $172,302
Bakersfield
Nominal: $188,765
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $166,901

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($199,204/year)
  • Larger job market (170 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $172,302)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose Bakersfield if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($256,305)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, nuclear medicine technologist salaries in San Francisco grew 51.9% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 65.8% growth in Bakersfield over the same period.

San Francisco, CA

+51.9%

$124,920 (2019) → $189,790 (2025)

Bakersfield, CA

+65.8%

$108,450 (2020) → $179,845 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays nuclear medicine technologists more: San Francisco or Bakersfield?

San Francisco has a higher median nuclear medicine technologist salary at $199,204/year, compared to Bakersfield at $188,765/year — a difference of $10,439 (5.53%).

What is the hourly rate difference between San Francisco and Bakersfield?

San Francisco nuclear medicine technologists earn $95.78/hr while Bakersfield hygienists earn $90.75/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from San Francisco to Bakersfield as a nuclear medicine technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing San Francisco and Bakersfield. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: San Francisco = $172,302, Bakersfield = $166,901), job availability (170 vs 101 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level nuclear medicine technologists earn in San Francisco vs Bakersfield?

Entry-level (10th percentile) nuclear medicine technologists earn $143,155 in San Francisco and $136,896 in Bakersfield. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

AC

Written by Alexandra Chen, MS, CNMT

Career Analyst

Alexandra has 10 years of experience in nuclear medicine. She specializes in PET imaging at a community hospital. She analyzes trends in the nuclear medicine job market.

Clinically reviewed by David Martinez, BS, CNMTData verified by Fatima Nasir, MS, CNMT

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 4.96% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Alexandra Chen, MS, CNMT, a licensed nuclear medicine technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov